"If you burn down my house, I don’t need to burn down yours”
Splashed on the front page of the Toronto Star on the morning of Tuesday, October 19th were two intriguing images: a man dressed in a pink bikini beside a photo of the same man dressed in military attire and saluting. At first glance the absurd contrast of the two could be considered comical but then we begin to read. Russell Williams held the high-ranking position of commanding officer at Canada’s most important air base. He has also pleaded guilty to murder. This article was only the start to a disturbing week of stories, the majority of which held detailed descriptions of the thousands of photos and video Williams had taken documenting his fetish that started as break and enters and escalated into the murders of two women.
The coverage of the Russell Williams case shocked saddened and deeply affected Canadians; many media outlets did not hold back on reporting the gruesome facts revealed in court.
Jim Rankin and Sandro Contenta’s Toronto Star article “A depraved double life”, CBC’s The Fifth Estate program “The Confession” and Christie Blatchford’s Globe and Mail article “Victims deserve delicacy, but should not rule our courtrooms” explore the sensationalism of the case, the psychological side of the story and the control victims should hold in a courtroom.
The analysis of the Williams’ story brings forth challenges because it is a case filled with horrifying material. Each media outlets’ coverage of the story questions where the balance should lie between feeding Canada’s fixation with humanity’s “evil” side, adequately informing citizens about what is happening in their country and being respectful to victims and their families.
“A depraved double life” focuses on cold facts about Williams’ fetishes and the murders of Comeau and Lloyd, reported from a sensationalist perspective. There is nothing in the article about Williams’ personal life; all we are told is that he was air force commander of CFB Trenton. This fact alone adds another sensationalist aspect to the story. The reporters were trying, and succeeded to create one very clear picture: Williams was a commanding officer and a murderer. Perhaps this is why there was nothing reported on his martial status, whether he had children, his educational background or his age.
The article begins with a report on Williams’ fetish break-ins where he tried on and stole women’s lingerie. The reporters were not cautious about the language they used to present the content which only escalates to specific, grotesque details: from the description of photos Williams took masturbating in the lingerie, the colour of the garments to poses he liked to model in front of the camera. The last half page of the article is dedicated to recounting specific gruesome details of the Comeau and Lloyd murders.
This article’s content is unfair to Williams’ victims and their families and challenges the level of respect and sensitivity that they are entitled to in a case as horrifying as this. Was it necessary to recount the murders of Marie-France Comeau and Jessica Lloyd in such detail? It seems that these facts were reported not to inform but to shock. Williams violated Comeau and Lloyd. It is not the media’s job to further exploit and humiliate them by presenting such graphic facts of their deaths to the public. Canadians do have a right to be informed about what is happening around them but this could have still been achieved in a respectful manner.
Unlike “A depraved double life”, Blatchford’s article is not about disclosing shocking facts from court. She instead takes on the perspective of the victims and expresses her opinion on the roles they should play in court trails.
She begins with the recount of a CTV interview with lawyer Tim Danson in which he stated that all the evidence of the Williams case should be “destroyed” to ensure that the victims are not “violated again”. Blatchford expresses that this should not happen because it would be disloyal to the open court principle. She argues that the victims and their relatives in the Williams’ case were greatly empowered; the audience clapped after the victim-impact statements which incorporated hateful comments towards Williams. The point of court trials, Blatchford states, is not to get justice for the victims and their families but to investigate and prosecute.
Blatchford is still respectful to the victims even though she is touching on a sensitive subject. Similar to the Toronto Star article, she comments on how Comeau did not stop fighting for her life. Her article does not state that the pain of the victims and their families is unwarranted but quite the opposite.
Blatchford’s article is presented fairly. She did not judge the trauma experienced by the victims and their families, nor does she defend Williams (which many undoubtedly felt she was doing). She instead offers a refreshing perspective of a case so fixated with the recount of gruesome details.
CBC’s The Fifth Estate program broadcasted “The Confession” on October 22nd, an hour long air of Williams’ interrogation tape in which he confesses to the Comeau and Lloyd murders.
The broadcast was set up similar to a newscast; footage was shown followed by a brief statement from Mark Mendelson and Paul Ciolino both esteemed interrogation investigators who analyzed Williams’ body language throughout the confession.
This coverage of the story takes on the perspective of the interrogating officer and the art of persuasion. The story is presented as a thriller, the music crescendoing as the confession grows in suspense. Unlike “A depraved double life”, the structure of the story focuses less on the gruesome details of the case and more on the physiological examination of Williams.
The broadcast of Williams’ confession can be compared to the argument Blatchford makes in her article. Was the airing of the confession going against the purpose of interrogation? These tapes are being broadcasted to fulfil human fascination. Of course those who have lapped up the gruesome details of the case in varying media outlets want to see Williams recite them himself. Was this broadcast used as a vehicle to inform or to feed the human fascination with “evil”?
During “The Confession” Ciolino directs a statement towards Williams from behind the scenes, “quit acting like a little girl” and states that the interrogator is “owning” and has “control” over Williams. This use of language suggests that “The Confession” is more about humiliating Williams than the analysis of human nature.
The analysis of the coverage presented by the above sources does not rule one approach as more successful. Picking the success of one source over the other is difficult because the goal of each media outlet is unclear. If it is being assumed that it was the Toronto Star’s goal to produce a sensationalist piece of news out of this story then they were the most successful. If it is being assumed that it was The Fifth Estate’s goal to produce a thrilling program out of this story then they were the most successful. What is evident however is that Blatchford’s coverage of the story was the fairest. There is no aspect of humiliation in her article or unnecessary details of the murders, evident in many media outlets’ coverage of this story.
The analysis of the above media outlets presents an unsettling conclusion. The majority of media outlets discussed above approached the story with little sensitivity. In an act to satisfy human’s fixation with the Mr. Hyde side of human nature, respect for victims and their families was sparse. The humiliation of Williams further led to the humiliation of all those affected by his actions. As Blatchford states, “if you burn down my house, I don’t need to burn down yours”; many of Canada’s media outlets need to consider this statement.